Skip to main content

Coil embolization of a giant pseudoaneurysm associated with a disrupted axillary artery: a case report

Abstract

Background

Stent-graft placement is generally used to treat pseudoaneurysm (PSA) of the axillary artery (AA) trunk to maintain the patency of peripheral vessels. Coil embolization of a PSA associated with a disrupted AA trunk has rarely been reported.

Case presentation

A 54-year-old woman presented with swelling of her right shoulder. She had had a right proximal humeral fracture 12 years earlier. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) and subsequent angiograms revealed a giant PSA at the disrupted, distal right AA. There were collateral flows to the brachial artery from the proximal to the right AA. To preserve collateral flows to the brachial artery, selective embolization of the inflow artery that derived from the distal AA was performed with hydrogel-coated coils. The post-embolization arteriogram showed no flow into the PSA, but collateral flows to the brachial artery we preserved. The post-embolization course was uneventful. The patient regained warmth in her right arm and hand on post-embolization day 4. Repeat CECT on post-embolization day 9 confirmed blood-flow to her right radial artery.

Conclusions

While a stent-graft should be used if the AA trunk can be preserved, coil embolization should be considered for PSA if the AA trunk is disrupted but collaterals are preserved.

Peer Review reports

Background

The axillary artery (AA) is the main vessel responsible for arterial supply of the upper limb. It commences from the subclavian artery at the outer border of the first rib and terminates at the outer border of the teres major muscle, where it transitions to the brachial artery. The AA is anatomically close to the glenohumeral joint and proximal humerus.

Pseudoaneurysms (PSAs) of the AA are rare [1]. They are associated with blunt trauma (such as proximal humeral fractures [2] and anterior glenohumeral dislocation [3]), penetrating injuries, and iatrogenic trauma (such as pacemaker placement [4]). Endovascular treatment is preferred over surgery because of technical feasibility related to the anatomical nature of the AA, as well as improved morbidity and mortality [5,6,7]. Stent-graft placement is used for the treatment of PSA in the AA main trunk to preserve the patency of peripheral vessel [8]. However, we used coil embolization to treat a case of PSA associated with the main trunk of AA disrupted by a humeral fracture.

Case presentation

A 54-year-old woman with schizophrenia presented with right shoulder swelling. She had had a right proximal humeral fracture 12 years earlier. Surgery was indicated for the fracture, but the family opted for conservative treatment because of concurrent Takotsubo cardiomyopathy. She had been unable to move her right arm spontaneously thereafter. During her admission at another hospital for rehabilitation a month before the referral to us, her right shoulder developed a swelling, which deteriorated over 3 weeks. She was then referred to our hospital. On admission, her right shoulder was markedly swollen (Fig. 1A) and painful on passive motion and had a purple skin color. Her right arm was cold. Doppler ultrasonography showed a “Yin-Yang sign” in the distal AA (Fig. 1B), which indicated a partial thrombosis of the PSA [9], while blood-flow was not detected in her right radial artery.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Photograph of the right swollen shoulder of the patient (A). The ‘Yin-Yang” sign detected via Doppler ultrasonography (B). The volume rendering image (C) and maximum intensity projection (D) of the pseudoaneurysm of the disrupted, right axillary artery and collateral blood-flow (arrowhead) to the right brachial artery (arrow) obtained via three-dimensional computed tomography angiography

Ultrasonography around the right humeral articulation revealed a 6-cm cystic structure located 5 cm from the skin, which was supplied by an artery. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) revealed a right proximal humeral fracture with posterior dislocation of the right humeral articulation and a 6-cm-diameter PSA connected to the right AA trunk, which were separated by a large hematoma (Fig. 1C and D).

Angioplasty of the AA was deemed impossible after consultation with the vascular and orthopedic surgeons. We decided to perform coil embolization to reduce the risk of extensive bleeding during the probable amputation of the arm. We placed a 4-Fr short sheath (Terumo Medical, Shibuya, Japan) in the right femoral artery and a Goodtec catheter JB2 (Medikit, Tokyo, Japan) in the brachiocephalic artery. Right AA angiography confirmed a giant PSA at the distal right AA (Fig. 2A). The right AA trunk was thought to be disrupted, given the lack of a vessel beyond the PSA. We identified collateral flows to the brachial artery from the proximal to the right AA (Fig. 2B). To preserve collateral flows to the forearm, selective catheterization of the inflow artery (diameter of 5 mm and length of 20 mm) to the PSA, which derived from the distal AA, was directly performed using Goodtec catheter JB2 (Fig. 2C). With the edge of the coil placed slightly out from the microcatheter (LIGHTHOUSE 0.021-inch microcatheter with an outer diameter of 2 Fr at the tip [PIOLAX, Yokohama, Japan]) into the PSA, we pushed the microcatheter back and forth to stack four coils (AZUR CX, Terumo Medical: 5 mm × 16 cm, 4 mm × 13 cm, and two 3 mm × 8 cm coils) at the inflow artery. The arteriogram showed no flow into the PSA, but collateral flows into the brachial artery were preserved (Fig. 2D).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Digital subtraction angiography (DSA) of the right axillary artery confirmed a giant pseudoaneurysm at the disrupted, distal right axillary artery and near the origin of collateral flows (arrowheads) (A) and blood-flow to the brachial artery (arrows) (B). DSA showed embolization of the inflow artery to the pseudoaneurysm with coils (C) and preservation of the collateral flows (arrowheads) to the brachial artery (arrows) (D)

The post-procedural course was uneventful. Based on the treatment for thromboangiitis obliterans, the patient was administered aspirin 100 mg and intravenous alprostadil 10 μg daily. She regained warmth in her right arm and hand, and her sense of touch in the hand improved on post-embolization day 4. Repeat CECT on post-embolization day 9 confirmed blood-flow to her right radial artery (Fig. 3). Thrombus formation within and no inflow into the PSA were also confirmed. Therefore, aspirin and alprostadil were discontinued. She was subsequently transferred to another hospital for rehabilitation. At the one-year follow-up consultation with her primary care physician, the swelling of her right shoulder had resolved; blood-flow to her radial artery was confirmed via ultrasonography. Thus, angiography was not repeated.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Presence of blood-flow at the right radial artery (arrow) on the maximum intensity projection of computed tomography angiography (A) and on the axial view of contrast-enhanced computed tomography (B)

Discussion

Treatments for AA-PSA reported in previous case reports and series include surgery, ultrasound-guided compression [10], percutaneous thrombin injection [11], and endovascular treatment (stent-graft placement and embolization) [8]. We opted for embolization over surgery owing to the high risk of intraoperative bleeding and anastomotic leak, as well as chronic nerve compression. Surgery is indicated if a hematoma compresses a nerve. Symptomatic nerve compression for ≥ 3.5 days leads to severe nerve damage [12]. Furthermore, surgery can be technically demanding because of the anatomical nature of AA and result in significant morbidity and mortality [5,6,7]. In our patient, the nerve may have been compressed for ≥ 3 weeks; thus, nerve damage, if present, could persist even after surgery [12]. Generally, it is easier to approach a vessel with coil embolization than with stent-graft placement, with a lower risk of distal embolism. In our patient, stent-graft placement was inappropriate because CECT did not show the patency of the distal AA. The angiogram showed blood-flow to the right forearm via collateral flows from the AA. Coil embolization of the AA trunk was considered possible because blood-flow to the forearm was preserved.

To maintain the position of a coil within an inflow vessel, interventional radiologists use a balloon to decrease the blood-flow [13] or temporarily detain part of the coil as an anchor in a target vessel branch. In our patient, we created a scaffold by using coils with a strong radial force and densely packed them to embolize a short segment of the right AA, ensuring that collateral flows to the forearm were not excluded. We chose hydrogel-coated coils, which expand in volume within the target vessel, thereby enhancing its obstruction effect [14].

Conclusion

While a stent-graft should be used if the AA trunk can be preserved, coil embolization is a treatment option for PSA if the AA trunk is disrupted but collaterals are preserved.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

References

  1. Shreve L, Jarmakani M, Javan H, Babin I, Nelson K, Katrivesis J, et al. Endovascular management of traumatic pseudoaneurysms. CVIR Endovasc. 2020;3(1):88.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Kumar RM, Reddy SS, Sharma R, Mahajan R, Talwar KK. Endovascular repair of a traumatic axillary artery pseudoaneurysm. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2009;32(3):598–600.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Stahnke M, Duddy MJ. Endovascular repair of a traumatic axillary pseudoaneurysm following anterior shoulder dislocation. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2006;29(2):298–301.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Parchmont EC, Mossad E, Pimpalwar S. Delayed pseudoaneurysm presentation after cardiac catheterization in a pediatric patient with congenital heart disease. J Clin Anesth. 2018;46:37–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Leong BD, Naresh G, Hanif H, Lee SK, Zainal AA, Sara CM. Endovascular management of axillosubclavian artery injuries: report of three cases. Surg Today. 2013;43(8):918–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Posner MP, Deitrick J, McGrath P, Mendez-Picon G, Sobel M, Lower RR, et al. Nonpenetrating vascular injury to the subclavian artery. J Vasc Surg. 1988;8(5):611–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. DuBose JJ, Rajani R, Gilani R, Arthurs ZA, Morrison JJ, Clouse WD, et al. Endovascular management of axillo-subclavian arterial injury: a review of published experience. Injury. 2012;43(11):1785–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Waller CJ, Cogbill TH, Kallies KJ, Ramirez LD, Cardenas JM, Todd SR, et al. Contemporary management of subclavian and axillary artery injuries-a Western Trauma Association multicenter review. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2017;83(6):1023–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Lupattelli T. The yin-yang sign. Radiology. 2006;238(3):1070–1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Szendro G, Golcman L, Klimov A, Yurfest S, Ohana N, Johnatan B, et al. Successful non-surgical management of traumatic pseudoaneurysm of the axillary artery by duplex guided compression obliteration. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 1997;13(5):513–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Karmegaraj B, Prabhu N, Kappanayil M, Kumar RK. Percutaneous ultrasound guided thrombin injection for axillary artery pseudoaneurysm following stenting of the arterial duct in two infants: Case report with review of literature. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2019;94(5):727–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Roganovic Z, Misovic S, Kronja G, Savic M. Peripheral nerve lesions associated with missile-induced pseudoaneurysms. J Neurosurg. 2007;107(4):765–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Carratola M, Parikh P, Tchorz K, Kauffman S. Traumatic axillary artery pseudoaneurysm treated with intravascular balloon occlusion and percutaneous thrombin injection. Radiol Case Rep. 2014;9(1):e00031.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Ferral H. Hydrogel-coated coils: product description and clinical applications. Semin Interv Radiol. 2015;32(4):343–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

None.

Funding

There was no funding source for this article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

NO, AK, and YI took care of the patient. NO and AK wrote the draft. NO, AK, and YI participated in critical revision of the manuscript. AK serves as a guarantor for this manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Akira Kuriyama.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Written informed consent was obtained from the patient's family for publication of this case report and any accompanying images.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Oka, N., Kuriyama, A. & Ishisaka, Y. Coil embolization of a giant pseudoaneurysm associated with a disrupted axillary artery: a case report. CVIR Endovasc 7, 28 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s42155-023-00408-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s42155-023-00408-4

Keywords