Skip to main content

Coil embolization of a thoracic aorta hematoma with branch artery pseudoaneurysm – case report



A thoracic aorta hematoma with branch artery pseudonaneurysm is a very rare complication of thoraric blunt trauma. The standard treatment of this type of injury is aortic endograft placement.

Case presentation

We present a case in which a thoracic aorta hematoma with branch artery pseudoaneurysm was treated with coil embolization instead of endografting.


Coil embolization of aortic injuries may be a safe and definitive treatment alternative in selected cases. This technique has the potential to reduce the risk of procedure-related complications.

Peer Review reports


Thoracic aortic injuries are one of the most devastating consequences of thoracic trauma. Blunt thoracic trauma is the second most common cause of thoracic aortic injury, typically caused by high-speed motor vehicle accidents, sport injuries, or falls.1.5–2% of patients suffering blunt thoracic trauma develop an aortic injury and 70–80% of them die at the scene of the accident (Lundervall 1964). Aortic injuries associated with blunt trauma are classified according to the Society for Vascular Surgery (SVS) in 4 grades. Grade I injuries (intimal tear) are treated conservatively, while grade II to IV injuries (intramural haematoma, pseudoaneurysm and rupture) are typically treated with endograft placement or open surgery (Lee et al. 2011). However, aortic endograft placement may occasionally lead to severe complications, depending on the level of graft placement and the length of coverage. Paraplegia and paraparesis due to spinal cord ischaemia are the most severe complications of thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) with an overall risk of 3.9% (1.1–13.3%) (Rizvi and Sullivan 2010; Bobadilla et al. 2013).

We present a patient in which a mixed aortic injury (grade II-III) (Fig. 1) was treated with a new approach using coil embolization instead of an aortic endograft.

Fig. 1

Diagram showing the mixed aortic injury (grade II and III) in two different perspectives. This lesion is characterized by a disruption of the intima and media layer with a contained pseudoaneurysm in the ostium of an intercostal artery

Case presentation

Initial presentation

A 59-year old man with history of a sports-associated polytrauma was admitted to our hospital. The initial whole-body computer tomography (CT)-scan showed an aortic lesion at the level of TH8 in addition to multiple rib fractures and a TH6-vertebral fracture. The aortic injury presented with the typical features of intramural hematoma with contained blood collection between the sub-intimal layer and the muscular and adventitial layers. The aortic tear also caused a pseudoaneurysm in the ostium of the TH8-intercostal artery with the following characteristics: a size of 11 × 7 × 16 mm and a small intimal defect of 1.4 × 1.8 mm (Figs. 2 and 3).

Fig. 2

a, b Thoracic aortogram in oblique position shows pre and post treatment appearance of the aortic injury (grade II-III) treated with coil embolization

Fig. 3

a, c Axial and sagittal images demonstrating intramural aortic haematoma with branch artery pseudoaneurysm at TH8 level. b, d Evidence of successful embolization after 21 months of follow, there are no signs of complication or re-filling of the pseudoaneurysm. e Flouroscopic image showing the coil-deployment inside the branch artery pseudoaneurysm

Because we were concerned regarding a potential endoleak type 2 through the intercostal artery into the defect after endograft placement and the risk of medullary ischaemia, we decided to treat the lesion through coil embolization.

Interventional procedure

After written informed consent by the patient, an elective intervention was performed under local anesthesia using a 4Fr right common femoral artery access.

A directed thoraco-lumbar (TH4-L2) aortogram was performed using a 4Fr straight graduated catheter (Angiodynamics Accu-Vu, Queensbury, NY, USA) (Fig. 3). Selective catheterization of the aortic tear at TH8 level was performed using a 4Fr SIM-1 catheter (Cordis, Miami Lakes, Florida, USA). Selective angiography confirmed communication of the cavity with the intercostal artery at the level of TH8. The spinal artery or anastomoses were not present between the TH8 intercostal artery and other vessels. We changed to a 4Fr C2 Cobra catheter (Cordis, Miami Lakes, Florida, USA) and using a 2,7Fr coaxial microcatheter system (Terumo Progreat, Tokyo, Japan) we selectively catheterized the corresponding intercostal artery TH8 via the aortic tear. First, a 10x320mm Hydrogel coated coil (Azur Microvention, Tustin, California, USA) was deployed in the intercostal artery to avoid future retrograde re-perfusion of the aortic lesion (back door embolization). Then, the pseudoaneurysm was filled with four 6x100mm IDC coils (Boston Scientific, Cork, Ireland). The coiling was challenging due to instability of the microcatheter, especially during the last phase of coil deployment, nevertheless, sufficient coil packing was achieved. The final angiogram showed complete occlusion of the pseudoaneurysm and no evidence of retrograde perfusion through the intercostal artery previously occluded (Fig. 2). No early complications were observed. The 4Fr sheath was removed, followed by manual compression. The total intervention time was 48 min from initial arterial access to last angiogram with a total radiation dose of 143,836 mGy/cm2.


During and after the procedure, vital signs and neurological signs were clinically monitored (paresthesia, temperature, power and sensation in the lower limbs). There was no clinical evidence of acute spinal ischaemia. The patient was sent to an observation unit for 24 h and was discharged from the hospital afterwards. After 3, 6, 12 and 21 months, the patient was followed with CT-Angiograms that showed no extension of the aortic tear (Fig. 3). The implanted coils remained in place and the aortic wall was completely normal without signs of aortic lesion reperfusion or complications (i.e. aortitis, aneurysm, dissection). During all this time the patient remained asymptomatic.


Traditionally, aortic injuries have been treated with endovascular stent grafting or open surgical techniques (Pang et al. 2015). However, new minimally invasive techniques can be used to treat selected cases as in this case (Luebke and Brunkwall 2014). The endovascular approach makes the post-interventional recovery faster and potential complications unlikely (i.e. wound infections, blood loss). With modern fluoroscopy imaging systems, the radiation dose is low and localization of vascular complex lesions more feaseble to identify and treat (Daye and Walker 2018). The use of coils instead of an endograft reduced the risk of medullary ischemia and allowed us to perform the intervention in an outpatient setting under local anesthesia. Thus, other costs from a hospital stay, such as intensive care unit placement, general anesthesia and an expensive endograft are avoided (Azizzadeh et al. 2013).

From the technical point of view, the embolization, in this case, was possible because the aortic tear was contained and only communicated with the thoracic aorta through a small hole, measuring 1,3 mm. This situation makes a coil embolization safe because the risk of coil migration is smaller in comparison to bigger wall defects, where retaining the coils inside the lesion is often difficult. Another special technical aspect was the application of the front and back door embolization concept due to the communication with the intercostal artery. When pseudoaneurysms are embolized in the presence of inlet and outlet vessels, the embolization of the pseudoaneurysm alone is not recommended because of potential reperfusion through the feeder vessels (Madhusudhan et al. 2016; Salsamendi et al. 2016). In this particular case, the front door - meaning the branch artery ostium- was not embolized.

Branch artery pseudoaneurysms are usually self-limited with a benign clinical course, making conservative treatment a feasible approach. Nevertheless, in case of pseudoaneurysm growth or persisting back pain, endovascular embolization is a safe and effective alternative procedure (Ferro et al. 2013).


In selected cases, mixed aortic injuries (grade II-III) may be eligible for coil embolization. This offers the possibility of a safe and less expensive treatment with reduced risk of procedure-related morbidity and complications.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.



Society of Vascular Surgery


Thoracic endovascular aortic repair


Computer tomography


  1. Azizzadeh A et al (2013) An outcome analysis of endovascular versus open repair of blunt traumatic aortic injuries. J Vasc Surg 57(1):108–114 discussion 115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bobadilla JL et al (2013) Low incidence of paraplegia after thoracic endovascular aneurysm repair with proactive spinal cord protective protocols. J Vasc Surg 57(6):1537–1542

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Daye D, Walker TG (2018) Complications of endovascular aneurysm repair of the thoracic and abdominal aorta: evaluation and management. Cardiovasc Diagn Ther 8(Suppl 1):S138–S156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ferro C, Rossi UG, Seitun S et al (2013) Aortic branch artery pseudoaneurysms associated with intramural hematoma: when and how to do endovascular embolization. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 36:422–432

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Lee WA et al (2011) Endovascular repair of traumatic thoracic aortic injury: clinical practice guidelines of the Society for Vascular Surgery. J Vasc Surg 53(1):187–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Luebke T, Brunkwall J (2014) Cost-effectiveness of endovascular versus open repair of acute complicated type B aortic dissections. J Vasc Surg 59(5):1247–1255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Lundervall J (1964) The mechanism of traumatic rupture of the aorta. Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand 62:34–46

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Madhusudhan KS et al (2016) Interventional radiology in the management of visceral artery pseudoaneurysms: a review of techniques and embolic materials. Korean J Radiol 17(3):351–363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Pang D, Hildebrand D, Bachoo P (2015) Thoracic endovascular repair (TEVAR) versus open surgery for blunt traumatic thoracic aortic injury. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 9:CD006642

    Google Scholar 

  10. Rizvi AZ, Sullivan TM (2010) Incidence, prevention, and management in spinal cord protection during TEVAR. J Vasc Surg 52(4 Suppl):86S–90S

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Salsamendi J, Pereira K, Rey J, Narayanan G. Endovascular Coil Embolization in the Treatment of a Rare Case of Post-Traumatic Abdominal Aortic Pseudoaneurysms: Brief Report and Review of Literature. Ann Vasc Surg. 2016;30:310.e1–310.e3108.

Download references


Not applicable.


This case report was not supported by any funding.

Author information




LS was the main author of the manuscript. TR was a major contributor in writing the manuscript. DB, RS, JR substantively revised it. RL was the main performer of the procedure and drafted the work. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lorant Szabo.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Consent for publication

Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this case report and any accompanying images.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Szabo, L., Reyes del Castillo, T., Benz, D. et al. Coil embolization of a thoracic aorta hematoma with branch artery pseudoaneurysm – case report. CVIR Endovasc 3, 40 (2020).

Download citation


  • Novel technique
  • Experimental treatment
  • Embolization
  • Aortic injury
  • Side branch pseudoaneurysm