Skip to main content

Advertisement

CVIR Endovascular
CVIR Endovascular Cover Image

Impact of uterine contractility on quality of life of women undergoing uterine fibroid embolization

CVIR Endovascular volume 2, Article number: 36 (2019) Cite this article

  • 405 Accesses

Abstract

Background

Although changes in uterine contractility pattern after uterine fibroid embolization (UFE) has already been assessed by cine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), their impact on quality of life outcomes has not been evaluated. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of uterine contractility on the quality of life of women undergoing UFE measured by the Uterine Fibroid Symptom and Quality of Life questionnaire (UFS-QOL).

Results

A total of 26 patients were included. MRI scans were acquired 30–7 days before and 6 months after UFE for all patients. The UFS-QOL was applied in person on first MRI exam day and 1 year after UFE and the outcomes were analyzed according to the groups of evolution pattern of uterine contractility: Group A: Unchanged Uterine Contractility Pattern, 38%; Group B: Favorable Modified Uterine Contractility Pattern, 50%; and Group C: Loss of Uterine Contractility, 11%. All UFE patients presented a reduction in the mean score for symptoms and increase in mean scores on quality of life. All patients in this cohort presented a reduction in mean symptom score and increase in the mean score of quality of life subscales. Group A had more relevant complaints regarding their sense of self-confidence; Group B presented worse sexual function scores before UFE, which improved after UFE compared to Group A.

Conclusions

Significant improvement in symptoms, quality of life, and uterine contractility was observed after UFE in women of reproductive age with symptomatic fibroids. Functional uterine contractility seems to have a positive impact on quality of life and sexual function in this population.

Level of evidence

Level 3, Non-randomized controlled cohort/follow-up study.

Open Peer Review reports

Background

Symptomatic uterine leiomyoma is highly prevalent in reproductive women (Vollenhoven et al. 1990; Peregrino et al. 2017; Mas et al. 2017), with a significant impact on quality of life, affecting physical and psychological wellbeing (Spies et al. 2002). A validated quality of life questionnaire was developed to specifically assess patients with symptomatic fibroids (Uterine Fibroid UFS-Qol) and it has been widely used to evaluate changes post-fibroid treatments in several trials (Spies et al. 2002; Williams et al. 2006; Harding et al. 2008; Oliveira Brito et al. 2017; Silva et al. 2016; Beaton et al. 2000). Uterine fibroid embolization (UFE) is recognized as a Level A treatment option for the management of leiomyomas in carefully selected patients, but its use for reproductive–age women with fibroids is still controversial (Mas et al. 2017). Moreover, the impact of fibroids in infertility is not yet clear. Most patients who are willing to become pregnant choose to undergo myomectomy, yet studies have demonstrated successful pregnancies post-UFE (Pisco et al. 2017; Mohan et al. 2013). One of the hypotheses for the association between fibroids and infertility is alteration of uterine contractility, according to Kunz’s classification (Kunz et al. 1996). Uterine contractility is known to be associated with the female hormone cycle and uterine functionality (Kunz et al. 1998a). It acts to eliminate peeling endometrium during the menstrual period; influences sperm transport, nesting, embryo implantation, pregnancy maintenance during the periovulatory phase; and is implicated in dysmenorrhea (Kunz et al. 1998a; Kunz et al. 1998b; Kunz et al. 2000a; Kunz et al. 2000b; Kunz and Leyendecker 2002; Togashi 2007; Kataoka et al. 2005). It is hypothesized that some uterine disorders, such as fibroids, could alter uterine contractility and functionality (Fornazari et al. 2019; Kido et al. 2014; Kido et al. 2011; Kido et al. 2007; Koyama and Togashi 2007; Leonhardt et al. 2012; Orisaka et al. 2007). The advent of cine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has made it possible to quantify and evaluate uterine contractility (Kunz and Leyendecker 2002; Togashi 2007; Kataoka et al. 2005; Fornazari et al. 2019; Kido et al. 2014; Kido et al. 2011; Kido et al. 2007; Koyama and Togashi 2007; Leonhardt et al. 2012; Orisaka et al. 2007; Kido et al. 2005a; Kido et al. 2005b; Kido et al. 2006; Kido et al. 2008; Nakai et al. 2001; Nakai et al. 2003; Nakai et al. 2004; Nishino et al. 2005; Yoshino et al. 2010; Yoshino et al. 2012). Our previous study measured changes in the contractility pattern post-UFE by cine MRI, however the impact of quality of life outcomes was not evaluated (Fornazari et al. 2019). Therefore, the objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of uterine contractility on quality of life, measured by the UFS-QOL, in women undergoing uterine artery embolization for the treatment of symptomatic fibroids.

Materials and methods

Study design

In this Institutional Review Board (IRB)-approved, Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) compliant study, a prospective cohort of patients undergoing UFE for symptomatic fibroids, all of whom had undergone prior evaluation of uterine contractility by cine-MRI, were included. Detailed methods are reported elsewhere (Kido et al. 2005b); the inclusion, non-inclusion, and exclusion criteria are giben in Table 1 below.

Table 1 Inclusion, non-inclusion, and exclusion criteria
Full size table

MRI scans were acquired 30–7 days before and 6 months after UFE, both ideally during the periovulatory cycle phase, which was estimated by adding 14 days to the first day of the last menstrual period. The Uterine Fibroid Symptom – Quality of Life (UFS-QOL) was applied in person on the first day of MRI and 1 year after UFE, during outpatient follow-up.

UFS-QOL questionnaire

The UFS-QOL questionnaire specifically assesses severity of symptoms (8 questions) and Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQL - 29 questions) among women undergoing UFE. The HRQL scale comprises the following sub-scales: concern, activities, energy/mood, control, self-consciousness and sexual function. All items are scored on a five-point Likert scale. The higher the score on the severity subscale of the questionnaire, the greater the severity of symptoms; the lower the scores on the HRQL subscales, the poorer the quality of life (Oliveira Brito et al. 2017) (Online Resource 1).

The original UFS-QOL questionnaire was written in English (Spies et al. 2002). It has since been translated to Portuguese and this translation validated, with good internal consistency, discriminant validity, construct validity, structural validity and responsiveness, along with adequate test-retest results. It is accepted by the Society for Interventional Radiology (Beaton et al. 2000), as described in the publications of Oliveira et al. (Oliveira Brito et al. 2017) and Silva et al. (Silva et al. 2016).

All participants were able to communicate in Portuguese.

Study measures

The image acquisition parameters consisted of obtaining scout images, followed by an SSFP (true FISP) cine MRI sequence for evaluation of contractility in the sagittal plane of the uterine cavity. This sequence was programmed to acquire a 10-mm-thick slice every 2.5 s for 4 continuous minutes, obtaining about 120 images from a single region of interest. The acquired images were viewed repetitively and consecutively at a rate of approximately 17 frames per second. Uterine contractility was defined as absent, ordered, and disordered, based on the classification of Nakai et al. (Nakai et al. 2003).

The UFS-Qol Scoring Manual was used for calculation of symptom severity. A sum score was created from the items listed below, and the formula was then used to transform the value. Higher scores are indicative of greater symptom severity, while lower scores are indicative of minimal symptom severity (Table 2).

Table 2 UFS-Qol formula to calculate symptom score, where higher score value indicates greater symptom severity
Full size table
$$ \mathbf{Transformed}\ \mathbf{Score}=\frac{\left(\mathrm{Actual}\ \mathrm{raw}\ \mathrm{score}-\mathrm{lowest}\ \mathrm{possible}\ \mathrm{raw}\ \mathrm{score}\right)}{\mathrm{Possible}\ \mathrm{raw}\ \mathrm{score}\ \mathrm{range}}\times 100 $$

For HRQL subscales (concern, activities, energy/mood, self-conscious, and sexual function), summed scores of the items listed below were created for each individual subscale. To calculate the HRQL total score, the value of each individual subscale (not individual items) was added. Higher scores are indicative of better HRQL (high = good) (Table 3).

Table 3 HRQL subscales formula to calculate total score. Higher scores indicate better HRQL (high = good)
Full size table
$$ \mathbf{Transformed}\ \mathbf{Score}=\frac{\left(\mathrm{Actual}\ \mathrm{possible}\ \mathrm{score}-\mathrm{actual}\ \mathrm{raw}\ \mathrm{score}\right)}{\mathrm{Possible}\ \mathrm{raw}\ \mathrm{score}\ \mathrm{range}}\times 100 $$

Statistical analysis

Statistical analyses were performed using Excel and Bioestat software. The Mann-Whitney and Wilcoxon tests were used for comparisons between and within groups, respectively. A significance level of 5% was used for all tests.

Results

Study population

Twenty-six patients were included, with a mean age of 36 years (range 30–41 years; SD, 4 years). Of these, 14 presented with bleeding and pelvic pain, 10 with bleeding, and 3 with pain.

Three uterine contractility patterns were defined according to change in contractility from baseline after UFE: group A: unchanged uterine contractility; group B, favorably modified uterine contractility; and group C, loss of uterine contractility (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure1

Stratification of participants by uterine contractility before and after UFE. Blue, group A; green, group B; red, group C

Full size image

Of the 26 patients included in our cohort, 10 (38%) had no change in contractility after UFE (group A), 13 (50%) had a positive change (group B), and 3 (11%) lost contractility (group C). Potential interference factors (uterine volume, necrosis pattern, fibroid localization, and index fibroid/myometrium) had no statistically significant effect (Fornazari et al. 2019).

All patients in this study presented a statistically significant reduction in mean symptom score and a statistically significant increase in mean quality of life scores (worry, activity, energy, self-control, self-confidence and sexual function) (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2
figure2

Average score obtained in the UFS-QOL questionnaire, before and after UFE

Full size image

Group A patients (unchanged uterine contractility pattern) presented a statistically significant reduction in mean symptom score and increase in the mean score of quality of life subscales, except for the sexual function subscale (p-value = 0.3232) (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3
figure3

Average score obtained in the UFS-QOL questionnaire, before and after UFE, in group A

Full size image

Group B (favorably modified uterine contractility pattern) showed a significant reduction in mean symptom score, and increase in mean quality of life subscale scores (Fig. 4).

Fig. 4
figure4

Average score obtained in the UFS-QOL questionnaire, before and after UFE, in group B

Full size image

As group C (loss of uterine contractility) comprised only 3 patients, no statistical analysis could be performed.

A comparative analysis between groups A and B, before UFE, demonstrated that the average scores of activity subscales and self-confidence were significantly higher in group A (Fig. 5). After UFE, a comparative analysis between groups A and B, demonstrated significantly higher scores in group A as compared to group B (Fig. 6).

Fig. 5
figure5

Average score obtained in the UFS-QOL questionnaire, before UAE, referring to patients in group A (blue) and group B (green)

Full size image
Fig. 6
figure6

Average score obtained in the UFS-QOL questionnaire, after UFE, referring to patients in group A (blue) and group B (green)

Full size image

Discussion

Most women with uterine fibroids report a negative impact of symptoms, such as abnormal uterine bleeding and pelvic pain, on their quality of life (Spies et al. 2002; Williams et al. 2006; Harding et al. 2008; Brito et al. 2014). UFE has been reported as a less morbid alternative in women who wish to preserve their uterus when hysterectomy and myomectomy are contraindicated, when fibroids are refractory to myomectomy, or when there is a high risk of conversion to hysterectomy (Spies et al. 2002; Pisco et al. 2017; Mohan et al. 2013; Fornazari et al. 2019). In this setting, UFS-QOL is a validated tool for measuring patient-reported symptoms and documenting clinical outcomes from surgical and interventional procedures (Spies et al. 2002; Williams et al. 2006; Harding et al. 2008), with good internal consistency, discriminant validity, construct validity, structural validity, test-retest similarity, and responsiveness, including in its Portuguese version (Oliveira Brito et al. 2017; Silva et al. 2016).

Our previous study began with the evaluation of uterine contractility before and after UFE in women with symptomatic fibroids using cine-MRI. Continuing this line of research, the present study aims to analyze the presentation of UFS-QoL scores among different three groups of change in uterine contractility pattern (group A: unchanged uterine contractility pattern, group B: favorable modified uterine contractility pattern, group C: loss of uterine contractility) (Fornazari et al. 2019).

Interpretation of the average USF-QOL questionnaire scores presented revealed a significant improvement in symptoms and quality of life in all patients after UFE (Fig. 4). These data before and after UFE are similar to the scores usually presented in other published series of patients undergoing UFE for symptomatic uterine fibroids (Maiara et al. 2017; Spies et al. 2005; Coyne et al. 2012). The significant improvement of uterine contractility (Fornazari et al. 2019) and simultaneous improvement of quality of life these patients experienced after UFE suggests that uterine contractility may have a positive impact on quality of life.

The three uterine contractility groups (A, B, C) did not present statistically significant demographic differences (age, pre-UFE uterine volume, post-UFE uterine volume, percentage of uterine volume reduction, total necrosis of embolized myomas and myoma-myometrium index), according to the work previously published by our group (Fornazari et al. 2019). Therefore, these factors were not associated with UFS-QOL scores.

The finding of higher average scores on the activity subscales, self-confidence, in group A (Fig. 5) demonstrates that patients in this group had more relevant complaints regarding their sense of self-confidence (conscious sensation of weight gain, size and appearance of abdomen, change in clothes when menstruating) and to activities such as fear of traveling, interference with physical activities, reduction of physical exercise, difficulty in carrying out usual activities, interference in social activities, and need for careful planning of routine activities.

Before UFE, group A presented a relatively high sexual function score in relation to other subscales; this means that sexual function was less affected in this group, and was not significantly affected after UFE (Fig. 3). In our previously published work, we did not identify statistically significant variables that could be correlated to this data (Fornazari et al. 2019). In this study, the only potentially relevant variable that could be associated with a low interference in sexual function, both before and after UFE, is the fact that this group experienced no change in uterine peristalsis.

Group B (favorably modified uterine contractility pattern) showed a significant improvement in symptoms and quality of life after UFE (Fig. 4). Sexual function scores were worse before UFE in group B and improved after UFE compared to group A.

When we analyzed groups A and B simultaneously after UFE, we found that 73% of patients (n = 19) presented a pattern of ordered uterine contractility and 3.8% had a disordered uterine contractility pattern (n = 1). Considering that all these patients experienced improvement of symptoms and quality of life after UFE, we can hypothesize that the resumption of functional uterine contractility may have a positive impact on quality of life and sexual function.

Nevertheless, our sample was small, and additional studies are required to detect the real impact of uterine contractility on fertility and quality of life.

Conclusions

Significant improvement in symptoms, quality of life, and uterine contractility was observed after UFE in women of reproductive age with symptomatic fibroids.

Functional uterine contractility seems to have a positive impact on quality of life and sexual function in this population.

Availability of data and materials

The demographic data on the groups of this study are available at https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-018-2053-6

Other datasets of the Uterine Fibroid Symptom and Quality of Life questionnaire (UFS-QOL) are not publicly available (due to personal information) but are available from the corresponding author (VAVF) on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

HIPPA:

Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act

HRQL:

Health-Related Quality of Life

IRB:

Institutional Review Board

MRI:

Magnetic resonance imaging

UFE:

Uterine fibroid embolization

References

  1. Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz MB (2000) Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 25:3186–3191

  2. Brito LG, Panobianco MS, Sabino-de-Freitas MM, Barbosa Hde F, de Azevedo GD, Brito LM et al (2014) Uterine leiomyoma: understanding the impact of symptoms on womens’ lives. Reprod health 11:10. https://doi.org/10.1186/1742-4755-11-10

  3. Coyne KS, Margolis MK, Bradley LD, Guido R, Maxwell GL, Spies JB (2012) Further validation of the uterine fibroid symptom and quality-of-life questionnaire. Value Health 15:135–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2011.07.007

  4. Fornazari VAV, Szejnfeld D, Szejnfeld J, Bonduki CE, Vayego SA, Goldman SM (2019) Evaluation of uterine contractility by magnetic resonance in women undergoing embolization of uterine fibroids. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 42:186–194. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-018-2053-6

  5. Harding G, Coyne KS, Thompson CL, Spies JB (2008) The responsiveness of the uterine fibroid symptom and health-related quality of life questionnaire (UFS-QOL). Health Qual Life Outcomes 6:99. https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-6-99

  6. Kataoka M, Togashi K, Kido A, Nakai A, Fujiwara T, Koyama T et al (2005) Dysmenorrhea: evaluation with cine-mode-display MR imaging--initial experience. Radiology 235:124–131. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2351031283

  7. Kido A, Ascher SM, Hahn W, Kishimoto K, Kashitani N, Jha RC et al (2014) 3 T MRI uterine peristalsis: comparison of symptomatic fibroid patients versus controls. Clin Radiol 69:468–472. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crad.2013.12.002

  8. Kido A, Ascher SM, Kishimoto K, Hahn W, Jha RC, Togashi K et al (2011) Comparison of uterine peristalsis before and after uterine artery embolization at 3-T MRI. AJR Am J Roentgenol 196:1431–1435. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.10.5349

  9. Kido A, Nishiura M, Togashi K, Nakai A, Fujiwara T, Kataoka ML et al (2005a) A semiautomated technique for evaluation of uterine peristalsis. J Magn Reson Imaging 21:249–257. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.20258

  10. Kido A, Togashi K, Kataoka ML, Nakai A, Koyama T, Fujii S (2008) Intrauterine devices and uterine peristalsis: evaluation with MRI. Magn Reson Imaging 26:54–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mri.2007.06.001

  11. Kido A, Togashi K, Nakai A, Kataoka M, Fujiwara T, Kataoka ML et al (2006) Investigation of uterine peristalsis diurnal variation. Magn Reson Imaging 24:1149–1155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mri.2006.06.002

  12. Kido A, Togashi K, Nakai A, Kataoka ML, Koyama T, Fujii S (2005b) Oral contraceptives and uterine peristalsis: evaluation with MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 22:265–270. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.20384

  13. Kido A, Togashi K, Nishino M, Miyake K, Koyama T, Fujimoto R et al (2007) Cine MR imaging of uterine peristalsis in patients with endometriosis. Eur Radiol 17:1813–1819. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-006-0494-9

  14. Koyama T, Togashi K (2007) Functional MR imaging of the female pelvis. J Magn Reson Imaging 25:1101–1112. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.20913

  15. Kunz G, Beil D, Deininger H, Wildt L, Leyendecker G (1996) The dynamics of rapid sperm transport through the female genital tract: evidence from vaginal sonography of uterine peristalsis and hysterosalpingoscintigraphy. Hum Reprod 11:627–632. https://doi.org/10.1093/HUMREP/11.3.627

  16. Kunz G, Beil D, Huppert P, Leyendecker G (2000a) Structural abnormalities of the uterine wall in women with endometriosis and infertility visualized by vaginal sonography and magnetic resonance imaging. Hum Reprod 15:76–82. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/15.1.76

  17. Kunz G, Herbertz M, Noe M, Leyendecker G (1998b) Sonographic evidence of a direct impact of the ovarian dominant structure on uterine function during the menstrual cycle. Hum Reprod 4:667–672

  18. Kunz G, Kissler S, Wildt L, Leyendecker G (2000b) Uterine peristalsis: directed sperm transport and fundal implantation of the blastocyst. In: Filicori M (ed) Endocrine basis of reproductive function. Monduzzi Editore, Bologna, pp 409–422

  19. Kunz G, Leyendecker G (2002) Uterine peristaltic activity during the menstrual cycle: characterization, regulation, function and dysfunction. Reprod BioMed Online 4(Suppl 3):5–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1472-6483(12)60108-4

  20. Kunz G, Noe M, Herbertz M, Leyendecker G (1998a) Uterine peristalsis during the follicular phase of the menstrual cycle: effects of oestrogen, antioestrogen and oxytocin. Hum Reprod Update 4:647–654. https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/4.5.647

  21. Leonhardt H, Gull B, Kishimoto K, Kataoka M, Nilsson L, Janson PO et al (2012) Uterine morphology and peristalsis in women with polycystic ovary syndrome. Acta Radiol 53:1195–1201. https://doi.org/10.1258/ar.2012.120384

  22. Maiara C, Obura T, Hacking N, Stones W (2017) One year symptom severity and health-related quality of life changes among black African patients undergoing uterine fibroid embolisation. BMC Res Notes 10:240. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-017-2558-0

  23. Mas A, Tarazona M, Dasí Carrasco J, Estaca G, Cristóbal I, Monleón J (2017) Updated approaches for management of uterine fibroids. Int J Women's Health 9:607–617. https://doi.org/10.2147/IJWH.S138982 eCollection 2017

  24. Mohan PP, Hamblin MH, Vogelzang RL (2013) Uterine artery embolization and its effect on fertility. J Vasc Interv Radiol 24:925–930. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvir.2013.03.014

  25. Nakai A, Togashi K, Kosaka K, Kido A, Hiraga A, Fujiwara T et al (2004) Uterine peristalsis: comparison of transvaginal ultrasound and two different sequences of cine MR imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 20:463–469. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.20140

  26. Nakai A, Togashi K, Ueda H, Yamaoka T, Fujii S, Konishi J (2001) Junctional zone on magnetic resonance imaging: continuous changes on ultrafast images. J Women Imaging 3:89–93

  27. Nakai A, Togashi K, Yamaoka T, Fujiwara T, Ueda H, Koyama T et al (2003) Uterine peristalsis shown on cine MR imaging using ultrafast sequence. JMRI 18:726–733. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.10415

  28. Nishino M, Togashi K, Nakai A, Hayakawa K, Kanao S, Iwasaku K et al (2005) Uterine contractions evaluated on cine MR imaging in patients with uterine leiomyomas. Eur J Radiol 53:142–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2004.01.009

  29. Oliveira Brito LG, Malzone-Lott DA, Sandoval Fagundes MF, Magnani PS, Fernandes Arouca MA, Poli-Neto OB et al (2017) Translation and validation of the Uterine Fibroid Symptom and Quality of Life (UFS-QOL) questionnaire for the Brazilian Portuguese language. Sao Paulo Med J 135:107–115. https://doi.org/10.1590/1516-3180.2016.0223281016

  30. Orisaka M, Kurokawa T, Shukunami K, Orisaka S, Fukuda MT, Shinagawa A et al (2007) A comparison of uterine peristalsis in women with normal uteri and uterine leiomyoma by cine magnetic resonance imaging. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 135:111–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2006.07.040

  31. Peregrino PFM, de Lorenzo MM, dos Santos SR, Soares-Júnior JM, Baracat EC (2017) Review of magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound in the treatment of uterine fibroids. Clinics (Sao Paulo) 72:637–641. https://doi.org/10.6061/clinics/2017(10)08

  32. Pisco JM, Duarte M, Bilhim T, Branco J, Cirurgião F, Forjaz M et al (2017) Spontaneous pregnancy with a live birth after conventional and partial uterine fibroid embolization. Radiology 285:302–310. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2017161495

  33. Silva RO, Gomes MT, Castro RA, Bonduki CE, Girão MJ (2016) Uterine fibroid symptom - quality of life questionnaire translation and validation into Brazilian Portuguese. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet 38:518–523. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0036-1593833

  34. Spies JB, Coyne K, Guaou NG, Boyle D, Skyrnarz-Murphy K, Gonzales SM (2002) The UFS-QOL, a new disease-specific symptom and health-related quality of life questionnaire for leiomyomata. Obstet Gynecol 99:290–300. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0029-7844(01)01702-1

  35. Spies JB, Myers ER, Worthington-Kirsch R, Mulgund J, Goodwin S, Mauro M (2005) The FIBROID registry: symptom and quality-of-life status 1 year after therapy. Obstet Gynecol 106:1309–1318. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.AOG.0000188386.53878.49

  36. Togashi K (2007) Uterine contractility evaluated on cine magnetic resonance imaging. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1101:62–71. https://doi.org/10.1196/annals.1389.030

  37. Vollenhoven BJ, Lawrence AS, Healy DL (1990) Uterine fibroids: a clinical review. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 97:285–298. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.1990.tb01804.x

  38. Williams VSL, Jones G, Mauskopf J, Spalding J, Duchane J (2006) Uterine fibroids: a review of health-related quality of life assessment. J Women's Health (Larchmt) 15:818–829. https://doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2006.15.818

  39. Yoshino O, Hayashi T, Osuga Y, Orisaka M, Asada H, Okuda S et al (2010) Decreased pregnancy rate is linked to abnormal uterine peristalsis caused by intramural fibroids. Hum Reprod 25:2475–2479. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deq222

  40. Yoshino O, Nishii O, Osuga Y, Asada H, Okuda S, Orisaka M et al (2012) Myomectomy decreases abnormal uterine peristalsis and increases pregnancy rate. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 19:63–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2011.09.010

Download references

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Funding

The authors have no financial relationships relevant to this article to disclose.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Interventional Radiology and Endovascular Surgery, Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), Rua Napoleão de Barros, 800, Vila Clementino, São Paulo, SP, 04024-002, Brazil
    • Vinicius Adami Vayego Fornazari
  2. Department of Simulation and Patient Experience, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit St #290, Boston, MA, 02114, USA
    • Gloria Maria Martinez Salazar
  3. Department of Statistics, Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR), Rua General Carneiro, 370, Centro, Curitiba, PR, 81531-990, Brazil
    • Stela Adami Vayego
  4. Hospital Universitário Maria Aparecida Pedrossian, Universidade Federal do Mato Grosso do Sul (UFMS), Av. Sen. Filinto Müler, 355, Vila Ipiranga, Campo Grade, MS, 79080-190, Brazil
    • Thiago Franchi Nunes
  5. Angiography Section Clinical Interventional Radiology Department, Instituto Portugues de Oncologia (IPO-Porto), R. Dr. António Bernardino de Almeida 865, 4200-072, Porto, Portugal
    • Belarmino Goncalves
  6. Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Escola Paulista de Medicina (EPM), UNIFESP, Rua Napoleão de Barros, 800, Vila Clementino, São Paulo, SP, 04024-002, Brazil
    • Jacob Szejnfeld
  7. Outpatient Clinics of Arterial Embolization of Uterine Myoma and Cardiovascular Diseases and Thromboembolism, Gynecological Endocrinology Course, Department of Gynecology, EPM, UNIFESP, Rua Napoleão de Barros, 800, Vila Clementino, São Paulo, SP, 04024-002, Brazil
    • Claudio Emilio Bonduki
  8. Department of Diagnostic Imaging, EPM, UNIFESP, Rua Napoleão de Barros, 800, Vila Clementino, São Paulo, SP, 04024-002, Brazil
    • Suzan Menasce Goldman
  9. Interventional Radiology and Endovascular Surgery, UNIFESP, Rua Napoleão de Barros, 800, Vila Clementino, São Paulo, SP, 04024-002, Brazil
    • Denis Szejnfeld
Authors
  1. Search for Vinicius Adami Vayego Fornazari in:
  2. Search for Gloria Maria Martinez Salazar in:
  3. Search for Stela Adami Vayego in:
  4. Search for Thiago Franchi Nunes in:
  5. Search for Belarmino Goncalves in:
  6. Search for Jacob Szejnfeld in:
  7. Search for Claudio Emilio Bonduki in:
  8. Search for Suzan Menasce Goldman in:
  9. Search for Denis Szejnfeld in:

Contributions

VAVF performed procedures and data collection. All authors participated in the analysis and interpretation of data as well as in the revision and approval of the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vinicius Adami Vayego Fornazari.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

This study was registered in the National Information System on Research Ethics Involving Human Beings (Sistema Nacional de Informação Sobre Ética em Pesquisa envolvendo Seres Humanos, SISNEP) and approved by the Research Ethics Committee/Plataforma Brasil (CAAE: 22039914.5.0000.5505).

Consent for publication

For this type of study consent for publication is not required.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fornazari, V.A.V., Salazar, G.M.M., Vayego, S.A. et al. Impact of uterine contractility on quality of life of women undergoing uterine fibroid embolization. CVIR Endovasc 2, 36 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1186/s42155-019-0080-2

Download citation

Keywords

  • Uterine fibroid
  • Leiomyoma
  • Dynamic MRI
  • Uterine peristalsis
  • Infertility
  • Quality of life
  • Validation studies
  • Questionnaire

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate. Please note that comments may be removed without notice if they are flagged by another user or do not comply with our community guidelines.