Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Short Communication
  • Open Access
  • Open Peer Review

Trends and implications of 24/7 interventional radiology in a newly opened acute hospital

  • 1Email author,
  • 1,
  • 1 and
  • 1
CVIR Endovascular20181:26

https://doi.org/10.1186/s42155-018-0033-1

  • Received: 12 September 2018
  • Accepted: 11 October 2018
  • Published:
Open Peer Review reports

Abstract

Introduction

We aim to evaluate the frequency of use and changing practices for all out-of-hours interventional radiology (IR) procedures performed in a new hospital.

Methods

This is a 5 year retrospective review of all out-of-hours procedures performed by the Interventional Radiology team from July 2010 to June 2015. Number and category of procedures performed were identified from the RIS database.

Results

Of the 7140 procedures performed by IR over the 5 years, 764 were out-of-hours. The total number of out-of-hours cases performed annually by IR has increased by 240% from year 1 to year 5. The variety and distribution of out-of-hours work has shown a characteristic trend with rising requests for advanced procedures such as active haemorrhage control.

Conclusion

The rising number and complexity of cases for on-call IR further supports the need for a formal on-call rota, ideally 1:6, to provide a sustainable 24/7 service and optimize patient outcome in an acute hospital.

Keywords

  • Interventional radiology
  • Out of hours
  • On call

Introduction

Interventional radiology (IR) is widely recognized as a pivotal clinical service in the management of emergency patients (Lerner et al., 2014) with a large evidence base for IR services’ contribution to improved patient outcomes and safety. The acute pathologies suitable for intervention are broad, from basic procedures such as drainage to time critical haemorrhage control. CIRSE guidelines have also strongly stipulated the need for 24-h IR availability in the endovascular treatment of traumatic haemorrhage (Chakraverty et al., 2012).

Royal College of Radiology (RCR) guidelines and the Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiological Society of Europe (CIRSE) recommendations are that out-of-hours (OOH) IR should be subject to a formal rota, to ensure safe and reliable service provision (The Royal College of Radiologists, 2017; Tsetis et al., 2016; The Royal College of Radiologists, 2014). In reality, implementation is difficult both in availability of manpower and resources, with a national survey of interventional radiology provision across England in 2014 reporting a formal OOH provision of 68%: specifically, OOH provision for nephrostomy of 65.6%, endovascular intervention of 77.8%, embolization for post partum haemorrhage of 59.8% and general embolization services of 67.4% (NHS Improving Quality, 2014). Many authors cite the need for strategic planning of 24/7 IR services (NHS Improving Quality, 2014; Zealley et al., 2012).

Singapore’s total population has been and continues to grow, totalling 5.47 million in June 2014. Demand in healthcare is projected to rise alongside its enlarging and increasing ageing population. Since 2011, an extra 1700 acute beds and 1200 community hospital beds have been added; with approximately 590 of those being from our current institute serving more than 700,000 people living in the northern sector of Singapore. To the authors knowledge, there is a lack of data regarding the use of interventional radiology out of hours service in a completely new public hospital serving a large community providing first world medical care. Therefore, this study reports the frequency of use and types of procedures performed annually by our unit over the last 5 years. The implications for a well supported IR team to provide such a service is also discussed.

Methods

This is a retrospective, 5-year, single-centre study performed at an acute hospital with trauma response facilities serving a neighbouring population of over 700,000. The hospital has been opened for just over 8 years, since July 2010. Since inception, there has been a separate IR on-call rota, starting with a single permanent interventional radiologist providing the dominant 24-h cover. A smaller percentage of the on-call cover was provided by “Visiting Consultants” who held dual positions in the private and public sector. From November 2014 to the end of the study, there were 4 full-time interventional radiologists supporting a two-tier on call system. Three provided a first on-call position, therefore working a 1 in 3 rota. Senior interventional radiology opinion was sought if required from the 4th IR Consultant. The remaining IR team members, consisting of 2 IR nurses and a dedicated IR radiographer, also follow a formal on-call rota.

All out-of-hours cases were identified via the hospital RIS database. Data was collated according to a full calendar year from 1st July to the 30th June of the next year. Inclusion criteria was purely time based, incorporating all procedures started outside of the normal working hours of 0800–1730 on a weekday, and all cases performed on the weekend or public holidays. Microsoft Excel® was used for data management and analysis. Procedures were classified as per Table 1.
Table 1

Classification of procedures, numbers of out-of hours performed annually and in total over 5 years

YEAR

Drainage

Vascular access

Thoracic angiography / embolization

Abdominopelvic angiography / embolization

Nephrostomy

Diagnostic neuroangiography

Peripheral vascular intervention

IVC filter

PTC

Visceral arterial stenting

Ureteric stent

TIPSS / BRTO

EVAR

Pulmonary thrombectomy

2010–2011

33

15

1

7

22

1

6

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

2011–2012

52

22

2

8

13

4

3

3

0

0

0

0

1

0

2012–2013

83

33

1

19

16

6

2

3

4

1

2

0

0

0

2013–2014

85

28

7

27

23

8

7

6

5

0

0

1

0

0

2014–2015

84

27

5

35

27

5

9

7

1

0

1

1

1

1

TOTAL

337

125

16

96

101

24

27

19

10

1

3

2

2

1

Results

Total annual number of out-of-hours cases has increased progressively throughout the 5 years from 85 to 204 (Fig. 1); as has the total number of IR procedures performed within the department (Table 2). The out-of-hours work as a percentage of all procedures performed has increased from 8% to 11–12%.
Fig. 1
Fig. 1

Total annual number of out-of-hours IR cases

Table 2

Number of out-of-hour compared to total number of IR procedures performed in the unit

YEAR

No. IR OOH procedures

Total no. IR procedures

% OOH

2010–2011

85

995

8.5

2011–2012

108

1178

9.1

2012–2013

170

1504

11.3

2013–2014

197

1639

12.0

2014–2015

204

1824

11.2

TOTAL

764

7140

 
The distribution of work throughout the week has also changed over the last 5 years (Table 3). The percentage of work being performed on the weekends has increased from 27.1% to 40.2%. Conversely, the percentage of cases performed out-of-hours on the weekdays has reduced from 65.9% to 56.9%.
Table 3

Distribution of out-of-hours cases performed through the week

 

2010–2011

2011–2012

2012–2013

2013–2014

2014–2015

Weekday

65.8%

58.3%

68.2%

59.4%

56.9%

Weekend

27.1%

28.7%

27.6%

36.5%

40.2%

Public Holiday

7.1%

13.0%

4.2%

4.1%

2.9%

The number of the procedures performed is shown in Table 1; and percentage contribution of each procedural subcategory in the respective year is illustrated in Figs. 2, 3, 4, 5, 6. Drain insertions have formed the majority of the workload throughout the years, at 41% in the past year. The 2nd and 3rd most common procedures have however demonstrated a change; with earlier years these were predominantly for either nephrostomy insertions or vascular access related procedures. The last 3 years have shown a steady increase of abdominopelvic angiogram and embolization procedures, which is now the 2nd most commonly performed out-of-hours procedure. Nephrostomy insertions and vascular access procedures are approximately joint 3rd in frequency performed.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2

Procedures performed as a percentage in year cycle 2010–2011

Fig. 3
Fig. 3

Procedures performed as a percentage in year cycle 2011–2012

Fig. 4
Fig. 4

Procedures performed as a percentage in year cycle 2012–2013

Fig. 5
Fig. 5

Procedures performed as a percentage in year cycle 2013–2014

Fig. 6
Fig. 6

Procedures performed as a percentage in year cycle 2014–2015

The variety and complexity of procedures have also increased throughout the years, from 7 to 13 sub-groups; now including advanced techniques of TIPSS/BRTO, EVAR and pulmonary thrombectomy.

Discussion

IR is playing an ever increasing role in the acute management of pathologies presenting across the clinical specialties both as the primary and secondary line of treatment (Ierardi et al., 2015). Both recent guidelines and standards of practice highlight the importance of having an interventional radiology team who are able to respond to a wide variety of clinical scenarios (Chakraverty et al., 2012; The Royal College of Radiologists, 2017).

With the rapidly expanding healthcare provision across Singapore, including both recent and future planned acute medical hospital openings, a well-trained, dedicated and certified IR team is a necessity for the delivery of first world medical care. Our data, as would be expected for a new hospital has shown a progressive increase in volume of work. In part, however, we suspect the availability of our team has altered the referral pathway and therapeutic regimes of emergency patients, and thus contributed to the increased workload. This is contrary to a recent study spanning 3.5 years across 11 hospitals offering a formal out-of-hours IR service covering a population of 1.2 million that concluded there was no evidence of expansion of demand despite availability (Christie et al., 2013). The increased volume of out-of-hours work, 240% from the 1st compared to the 5th year, arguably impacts the workflow pattern of the on-call interventionalists.

Recommendations are for a minimum of 6 radiologists to provide a comprehensive 24/7 IR service (The Royal College of Radiologists, 2017; Tsetis et al., 2016; The Royal College of Radiologists, 2014), with appropriate provisions for next-day radiology cover in the event of overnight cases, to allow sufficient rest and avoid compromise to patient safety. Our team has grown from a single interventionalist to 4, with a dedicated trained specialist IR nursing and radiography team. As demonstrated by Goltz et al. (Goltz et al., 2014) and in our study, we have managed to provide a 24/7 IR service with 3 first on-call radiologists. This partly reflects the geography of the city state, in which travel to the hospital is manageable within 45 min from most parts of the island, thus allowing an off-site on-call system. However, long-term sustainability based on 3 interventionalists is difficult and networking solutions with nearby units would allow a more healthy rota of 1:6 for a population of < 1 million (Ierardi et al., 2015; Lerner et al., 2014). In addition, a cascade system of workflow led by our specialist trained nurses allows a rapid and smooth patient pathway from point of acceptance of referral by the Interventional Radiologist on-call, to the IR procedure and subsequent discharge back to the clinical team’s care. This may serve as a benchmark for newer units with potentially larger capacity for their expected workload projections and implications of this for their IR teams.

In tandem with the rising volume of cases, we have experienced increasing complexity of interventional procedures requested and performed. The increase in abdominopelvic angiography and embolization procedures reflects our institute’s development of an acute trauma unit and IR’s subsequent role in their management. A fully supportive IR team is critical to avoid the reported differing standards of care and outcome experienced by a patient dependent upon time of presentation to hospital (Schwartz et al., 2014). Despite the relatively few number of interventionalists (4 interventional radiologists vs 23 diagnostic radiologists), it should not impede initiation or continuation of a 24/7 service. In our unit, since the introduction of a two-tier on-call system, > 95% of the cases can be handled by the first on-call interventional radiologist. Only a much smaller percentage of cases require the further expertise of our more seasoned interventionalist.

Our unit has also experienced a greater proportion of the work being performed during the weekends; 40.2% in 2015 compared to 27.1% in 2010. This probably reflects an increasing preferential utilization of IR services during the weekend and, our flexible and responsive action in-hours.

In this study, we included all cases that were started out-of-hours. This therefore did not include any urgent emergency cases performed within regular working hours or those cases extending beyond the regular working day. As we were proposing to study the utility of out-of-hours IR work, cases that may be deemed neither life nor limb threatening were also included such as those that were delayed due to accommodation of emergency cases. Nevertheless, a responsive IR team can undoubtedly benefit patient’s care and overall satisfaction, preventing prolonged in-hospital stays.

Conclusion

Our single-centre data incorporating all out-of-hours cases performed over the last 5 years since inception has demonstrated a progressive increase in volume and complexity of interventional procedures and, provides a benchmark for newly opened and planned hospitals. Drainage procedures have formed the majority of the work, although abdominopelvic angiography and embolization procedures have shown a steady increase. A sufficient number of trained interventionalists, ideally a 1:6 rota, with sufficient free time compensation is recommended to support a sustainable 24/7 IR clinical service in an acute hospital.

Abbreviations

BRTO: 

Balloon-occluded retrograde tranvenous obliteration

CIRSE: 

Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiological Society of Europe

EVAR: 

Endovascular aneurysm repair

IR: 

Interventional radiology

OOH : 

Out-of-hours

RCR: 

Royal College of Radiology

TIPSS: 

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt

Declarations

Acknowledgements

None.

Funding

Not applicable.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Author’s contributions

1 guarantor of integrity of the entire study: RC/SB. 2 study concepts and design: RC. 3 literature research: RC. 4 clinical studies: N/A. 5 experimental studies / data analysis: N/A. 6 statistical analysis: RC. 7 manuscript preparation: RC/AC/SS/SB. 8 manuscript editing: RC/AC/SS/SB. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

For this type of study formal consent is not required.

No identifiable patient details required informed consent.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Diagnostic Radiology at Khoo Teck Puat Hospital, 90 Yishun Central, Singapore, 768828, Singapore

References

  1. Chakraverty S, Flood K, Kessel D, McPherson S, Nicholson T, Ray CE Jr et al (2012 Jun) CIRSE guidelines: quality improvement guidelines for endovascular treatment of traumatic hemorrhage. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 35(3):472–482View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Christie A, Robertson I, Moss J (2013 Aug) Interventional radiology emergency service provision for a larger UK urban population: initial 3.5 years of experience. Clin Radiol 68(8):e440–e446View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Goltz JP, Janssen H, Petritsch B, Kickuth R (2014 Feb) Launching a permanent out-of-hour interventional radiology service: single-center experience from a German University hospital. Rofo 186(2):136–141PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Ierardi AM, Piacentino F, Fontana F, Petrillo M, Floridi C, Bacuzzi A et al (2015 Jul) The role of endovascular treatment of pelvic fracture bleeding in emergency settings. Eur Radiol 25(7):1854–1864View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Lerner EV, Willenbring BD, Pirrallo RG, Brasel KJ, Cady CE, Colella MR et al (2014 Apr) A consent-based criterion standard for trauma center need. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 76(4):1157–1163View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. NHS Improving Quality. Interventional Radiology Provision in 2014. A survey of English NHS trusts. Available from: http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20151103113730/http://www.nhsiq.nhs.uk/media/2647301/nhsiq_irsurvey.pdf
  7. Schwartz DA, Medina M, Cotton BA, Rahbar E, Wade CE, Cohen AM et al (2014 Jan) Are we delivering two standards of care for pelvic trauma? Availability of angioembolization after hours and on weekends increases time to therapeutic intervention. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 76(1):134–139View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. The Royal College of Radiologists (2014) Provision of interventional radiology services. The Royal College of Radiologists, London Available from: https://www.rcr.ac.uk/publication/provision-interventional-radiology-services Google Scholar
  9. The Royal College of Radiologists (2017) Standards for providing a 24-hour interventional radiology service, second edition. The Royal College of Radiologists, London Available from: https://www.rcr.ac.uk/system/files/publication/field_publication_files/bfcr171_24hr_ir.pdf Google Scholar
  10. Tsetis D, Uberoi R, Fanelli F, Roberston I, Krokidis M, van Delden O, Radeleff B, Müller-Hülsbeck S, Szerbo-Trojanowska M, Lee M, Morgan R, Brountzos E, Belli AM (2016 Apr) The provision of interventional radiology Services in Europe: CIRSE recommendations. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 39(4):500–506View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Zealley IA, Gordon TJ, Robertson I, Moss JG, Gillespie IN (2012 Sep) Provision of out-of-hours interventional radiology services in Scotland. Clin Radiol 67(9):855–861View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s) 2018

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate. Please note that comments may be removed without notice if they are flagged by another user or do not comply with our community guidelines.

Advertisement