Skip to main content

Table 3 Clinical and technical success rate in each study analysed

From: Embolization for acute nonvariceal bleeding of upper and lower gastrointestinal tract: a systematic review

First author, year

Number of patients

Technical success rate (%)

Clinical success rate (%)

Aina et al., 2001 (2001)

29

98.7%

76%

Arrayeh et al., 2012 (2012)

56

-

-

Defreyne et al., 2001 (2001)

6

100%

83%

Dempsey et al., 1990 (1990)

39

-

-

Dixon et al., 2013 (2013)

20

95%

80%

Encarnacion et al., 1992 (1992)

29

62%

82%

Heianna et al., 2014 (2014)

6

100%

100%

Holme et al., 2005 (2006)

28

100%

61%

Ichiro et al., 2011 (2011)

36

100%

83%

Kaminskis et al., 2019 (2019)

58

100%

96.6%

Katano et al., 2012 (2012)

2

100%

100%

Kim et al., 2009 (2009)

75

100%

86%

Lang et al., 1992 (1992)

7

100%

86%

Lau et al., 2019 (2019)

96

100%

94%

Laursen et al., 2014 (2014)

49

-

-

Lee et al., 2012 (2012)

10

-

-

Ljungdahl et al., 2002 (2002)

4

100%

100%

Mille et al., 2015 (2015)

75

98%

87%

Morris et al., 1986 (1986)

9

100%

67%

Muhammad et al., 2019 (2019)

32

96.9%

92%

Padia et al., 2009 (2009)

72

-

-

Peynircioglu et al., 2011 (2011)

42

100%

62.5%

Poultisides et al., 2008 (2008)

22

94%

51%

Schenker et al., 2001 (2001)

103

95%

75%

Shi et al., 2017 (2017)

5

100%

60%

Sildiroglu et al., 2014 (2014)

18

100%

67%

Song et al., 2011 (2011)

6

100%

67%

Spiliopoulos et al., 2018 (2018)

10

100%

-

Tandberg et al., 2012 (2012)

25

100%

68%

Toyoda et al., 1995 (1995)

5

100%

80%

Yap et al., 2013 (2013)

38

99%

76%

Yata et al., 2013 (Yata et al. 2013)

7

100%

96%