Table 2 Comparison of embolisation subgroups
From: Impact of site of occlusion in proximal splenic artery embolisation for blunt splenic trauma
Number of patients | Number of embolisations | Age (mean, SD) | Gender (M:F, percentage) | AAST Grade | Time to embolisation (median, range) | Complications (number, percentage) | Splenectomy (number, percentage) | Follow-up imaging | Splenic perfusion (number, percentage) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
III | IV | V | CT | US | |||||||||
Type I ≤DPA | 7 | 7 | 47 (22.4) | 6:1 (86%) | 4 | 2 | 1 | 0 (0–1) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 5 | 0 | 5 (100%) |
Type II DPA-GPA | 27 | 27 | 51 (22.9) | 21:6 (78%) | 8 | 12 | 7 | 0 (0–2) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 7 | 4 | 11 (100%) |
Type III ≥GPA | 24 | 25 | 53 (20.9) | 17:7 (71%) | 4 | 8 | 13 | 0 (0–5) | 3 (12.5%) | 2 (8%) | 16 | 2 | 17 (94%) |