Skip to main content

Table 3 Comparison of procedure and radiation exposure metrics, stratified by fluoroscopy system and bleed location

From: Patient radiation dose during angiography and embolization for abdominal hemorrhage: the influence of CT angiography, fluoroscopy system, patient and procedural variables

Location

N

Duration (mins)

DSA runs

FT (seconds)

PKA (cGy.cm2)

Ka,r (mGy)

OS

 Extraluminal

36

55 (38–74.5)

8 (6–10)

944.5 (661.5–1551.5)

23,694 (15011–5681)

1200 (500–2000)

 Upper GI

9

41 (30–56)

9 (6–10)

1378 (874–2395)

13,736 (10078–0681)

950 (550–1850)

 Lower GI

16

48 (27.5–64.5)

9 (6–11)

979.5 (622–1370)

28,788 (14573–41,471)

1200 (500–2450)

 Subtotal

61

51 (35–71)

8 (6–10)

1009 (672–1524)

23,786 (14010–6992)

1150 (500–2000)

p-value

 

0.367

0.768

0.534

0.349

0.794

NS

 Extraluminal

49

65 (40–89)

7 (5–10)

1212 (738–1673)

8618 (3984–24,330)

635 (249–1668)

 Upper GI

29

54 (40–80)

8 (4–12)

885 (622–1749)

5511 (1545–11,686)

327 (114–847)

 Lower GI

15

56 (34–76)

7 (4–8)

747 (562–1778)

2906 (2435–7387)

344 (186–424)

 Subtotal

93

60 (40–86)

7 (4–9)

1083 (664–1744)

6227 (2435–16,568)

408 (183–953)

p-value

 

0.684

0.596

0.516

0.025*

0.055

  1. OS old system (Axiom Artis DTA), NS new system (Axiom Artis Q), FT fluoroscopy time, PKA air kerma-area product, Ka,r reference air kerma. *- There was a significant difference in PKA medians between bleeding locations for the NS by KW-ANOVA (p = 0.025) but post hoc analysis found no significant between group differences (Table 4)