Skip to main content

Table 4 Success and Failure Rate of Recently Published AVS studies

From: Adrenal vein sampling: technique and protocol, a systematic review

Study

Success rate

Failure R only

Failure L only

Failure B

German Conn (Vonend et al. 2011)

41.1 (126/306)

36.6 (112/306)

9.5 (29/306)

12.7 (39/306)

Deipolyi (Deipolyi et al. 2015)

63 (58/92)

30.4 (28/92)

2.1 (2/92)

4.3 (4/92)

Teng (Teng et al. 2015)

55% (26/47)

NR

NR

NR

Page (Page et al. 2018)

71.4% (105/147)

23.1% (34/147)

5.4% (8/147)

0/147

Kocjan (Kocjan et al. 2020)

77% (198/259)*

14%(33/235)*

3.8% (9/235)*

NR

AVIS-2 (Rossi et al. 2019)

80.1% (1302/1625)

NR

NR

NR

Lee (Lee et al. 2020)

89.5% (43/48)

6.3 (3/48)

0% (0/48)

4.2% (2/48)

Sparticus (Dekkers et al. 2016)

95.8% (92/96)

4.2% (4/96)

0

0

Ota (Ota et al. 2016)

99.2% (124/125)

0.8% (1/125)

0

0

  1. AVS success rates of published articles in last 10 years. *-This study variably reported success rates by procedure for overall and then by patient regarding left or right side. As 10% of patients had a repeat AVS, the reported right and left success rates differ from overall success. NR = not reported. Success rates depend on the strictness of criteria used to define success (Lethielleux et al. 2015), which were not standardized across these studies