Skip to main content

Table 2 Comparison of radiation dose - related features of PAE for the two groups

From: Prostatic artery embolization performed in anteroposterior projections versus steep oblique projections: single centre retrospective comparative analysis

 

S-PAE (n = 34)

AP-PAE (n = 12)

P-value

Fluoroscopy time (mean ± SD, min)

57.9 ± 21.7

46.3 ± 11.1

0.084

DAP (mean ± SD,μGy.m2)

35,800.4 ± 16,819.9

22,924.9 ± 11,305.9

0.018*

Number of runs per session

23.6 ± 6.5

20.3 ± 7.4

0.188

Number of images per session

240.7 ± 66,3

217.2 ± 79.1

0.370

Contribution of acquisitions vs fluoroscopy in DAP (%)

60.6/39.4

52.1/47.9

0.226

  1. SD standard deviation, DAP dose area product
  2. * statistically significant