Skip to main content

Table 1 Baseline demographic, anatomic and clinical data for the two patient groups of this study

From: Prostatic artery embolization performed in anteroposterior projections versus steep oblique projections: single centre retrospective comparative analysis

 

S-PAE (n = 34)

AP-PAE (n = 12)

P-value

Age (yrs), (mean ± SD, years)

73.3 ± 7.9

73.9 ± 9.7

0.832

BMI, (mean ± SD)

27.0 ± 3.5

27.9 ± 3.6

0.451

PV (mean ± SD, ml)

89.5 ± 27.4

111.4 ± 42.8

0.047*

PA diameter (mean ± SD, mm)

1.4 ± 0.2

1.7 ± 0.2

< 0.001*

Tortuosity Index (mean ± SD)

2.3 ± 0.8

1.9 ± 0.8

0.152

Stenosis index (mean ± SD)

1 ± 0.42

1 ± 0.94

1.000

LUTS, proportion of pts

25/34

9/12

0.921

IPSS (mean ± SD)

25.5 ± 5.6

28.8 ± 3.3

0.107

PVR (mean ± SD, ml)

158 ± 62

143 ± 87

0.580

IBC (% of pts)

26.5 (n = 9)

25 (n = 3)

0.921

  1. SD standard deviation, BMI body mass index, PV prostate volume, PA prostate artery, LUTS lower urinary tract symptoms, IPSS international prostate symptom score, PVR post void residual, IBC indwelling bladder catheter
  2. *statistically significant