Skip to main content

Table 2 Assessment of perioperative records over a period of 18 months

From: Audit of electronic operative documentation in interventional radiology: the value of standardised proformas

Standard:

1st Audit

2nd Audit

3rd Audit

Paper records

Electronic records

Electronic records with proforma

Electronic

Vs Paper

Proforma

Vs Paper

Vs Electronic

n (%)

n (%)

Absolute change (%)

p-value

n (%)

Absolute change (%)

p-value

Absolute change(%)

p-value

Name & signature noted

38 (76)

23 (100)

+ 24

0.008

26 (100)

+ 24

0.006

Type of consent recorded

28 (56)

22 (96)

+ 40

< 0.001

26 (100)

+ 44

< 0.001

+ 4

0.469

WHO checklist Completed

43 (86)

9 (39)

−47

< 0.001

26 (100)

+ 14

0.088

+ 17

< 0.001

Medications administered

32 (64)

15 (65)

+ 1

1.000

19 (73)

+ 9

0.606

+ 8

0.757

Puncture site noted

49 (98)

21 (91)

−7

0.232

26 (100)

+ 2

1.000

+ 9

0.215

Complications recorded

27 (54)

14 (61)

+ 7

0.621

25 (96)

+ 42

< 0.001

+ 35

0.003

Legibility of records

43 (86)

23 (100)

+ 14

0.090

26 (100)

+ 14

0.088

Vital monitoring recorded

49 (98)

1 (4)

− 94

< 0.001

24 (92)

−6

0.268

+ 88

< 0.001

Bed rest instructions

50 (100)

16 (70)

− 30

< 0.001

26 (100)

+ 30

0.003

Puncture site instructions

48 (96)

2 (9)

−93

< 0.001

25 (96)

1.000

+ 87

< 0.001

Distal pulse instructions

48 (96)

1 (4)

−92

< 0.001

23 (88)

−8

0.331

+ 84

< 0.001

Anti-coagulation regime

27 (54)

15 (65)

+ 11

0.449

21 (81)

+ 27

0.026

+ 16

0.332

Oral Intake instructions

47 (94)

1 (4)

−90

< 0.001

23 (88)

−6

0.406

+ 84

< 0.001

Follow-up plans

12 (24)

15 (65)

+ 41

0.001

14 (54)

+ 30

0.012

−11

0.562

Total

50 (100)

23 (100)

 

26 (100)

 
  1. Note: (−) is due to missing p-values as there was no difference across groups