Skip to main content

Table 2 Baseline characteristics learning and established method in ProGlide and in Manta VCD

From: Access site complications after transfemoral aortic valve implantation - a comparison of Manta and ProGlide

  ProGlide learning Manta learning p ProGlide established Manta established p
Number of patients 25 25   51 50  
Age (years) mean ± SD 81.2 ± 7.6 80.9 ± 7.1 0.893 80.6 ± 8.7 81.3 ± 6.3 0.612
Female, n (%) 18 (72.0) 12 (48.0) 0.083 28 (54.9) 21 (42.0) 0.195
BMI (kg/m2) 24.1 ± 5.1 24.7 ± 4.7 0.710 26.3 ± 4.4 26.2 ± 4.0 0.897
Diabetes, n (%) 2 (8.0) 4 (16.0) 0.384 12 (23.5) 11 (22.0) 0.854
Hypertension, n (%) 15 (60.0) 18 (72.0) 0.370 38 (74.5) 36 (72.0) 0.776
Prior PCI, n (%) 8 (32.0) 5 (20.0) 0.333 15 (29.4) 21 (42.0) 0.186
Prior CABG, n (%) 1 (4.0) 2 (8.0) 0.551 9 (17.6) 5 (10.0) 0.266
Kreatinin (μmol/L) 98.0 ± 27.7 101.8 ± 32.4 0.657 96.5 ± 36.9 95.1 ± 24.9 0.823
eGFR 57.0 ± 19.9 60.0 ± 20.1 0.645 60.0 ± 20.1 61.1 ± 16.7 0.753
(CKD-EPI, mL/min/1.73 m2)
STS/ACC TAVR score 3.0 ± 1.0 3.0 ± 1.3 0.904 2.8 ± 1.0 2.6 ± 0.8 0.359
(mean ± SD)  
Echocardiographic parameters:
 LVEF (%) mean ± SD 55.1 ± 6.0 50.9 ± 12.8 0.151 53.8 ± 6.8 52.5 ± 10.4 0.464
 Mean aortic valve gradient 54.0 ± 11.2 49.3 ± 16.5 0.265 53.5 ± 17.4 52.3 ± 15.1 0.717
(mmHg) mean ± SD
 Aortic valve area (cm2) 0.6 ± 0.2 0.6 ± 0.1 0.964 0.7 ± 0.2 0.6 ± 0.2 0.331
mean ± SD
Anatomic data, minimal luminal diameter:
 Common femoral artery (mm) 8.1 ± 1.2 7.5 ± 1.5 0.1462 7.7 ± 1.5 8.4 ± 1.4 0.019
mean ± SD
 External iliac artery (mm) 8.3 ± 1.4 7.7 ± 1.4 0.140 8.1 ± 1.2 8.3 ± 1.4 0.420
mean ± SD
 Calcification ≥ moderate, n (%) 17 (68.0) 13 (52.0) 0.248 31 (60.8) 19 (38.0) 0.022
  1. SD Standard Deviation, BMI Body Mass Index, PCI Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, CABG Coronary Artery Bypass Graft, eGFR; estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate, STS/ACC Society of Thoracic Surgeons/American College of Cardiology, TAVR Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement LVEF; Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction